AirbrushTalk©
The newsletter for Airbrush enthusiasts brought to you by
ARTtalk
|
|
by Kirk Lybecker Every time I try to make a happy accident it winds up looking more labor intensive than the pyramids and phonier than a low budget science fiction film. I also see this as the principle paradox in watercolor. If you treat watercolor like an oil painting it will look overworked. If you treat it as a spontaneous, action you have little control over the outcome. So I, the red blooded American that I am, opt for a technical solution. Needless to say I have figured out that there are ways to get around most any conundrum that art throws at you.( Other than why do you make it in the first place.) I suppose that I should give you some of my personal background in art. I got off to a rather late start as far as watercolor goes, in graduate school. I made a series of watercolors that incorporated most of the major mistakes that amateurs are heir to. My next encounter with watercolor was during one of my irregular brushes with gainful employment. I was teaching Oil painting at a local community college when one of the other instructors went on sabbatical (or at least that is what he said). I was asked if I could teach a watercolor class and lying, said yes. It was there that I discovered that I hadn't even scratched the surface in my attempts to catalogue the missteps that watercolor offers. In desperation I actually read some of the books that were available on how to do watercolors further increasing my knowledge of how to do things wrong. This at least did allow me to talk my way through the semester even if I couldn't actually demonstrate the thing I was droning on about. At the same time I was trying to use an airbrush to do some oil painting. I had got the brush and some paint from a friend in graduate school. The one thing he neglected to add was the instructions. So like the watercolor I was finding things out in the trial and error method. (it seemed more like the error and error method at the time) The airbrush was a perfect glazing tool. When working, it could lay down the lightest most transparent of glazes without a brush mark. It's main problem was that it worked most poorly when not cleaned. And oil paint is a bear to get out of an airbrush. Watercolor on the other hand was very easy to clean out of the brush. And since washes and glazing were the things that I was having the most problem with in watercolor it just seemed a natural to incorporate the two. I was talking earlier about the catalogue of things that you can do wrong in a watercolor. I do not expect to live nearly long enough to get through chapter 2. The main problem is that the more you work to get to look right, the more one muddies the water - so to speak. If you have a wash, chances are that it is anemic. So to put more color in it you have to rewet. This causes two problems. First you disturb the underlying wash which will redeposit paint unevenly. Second is that owing to the surface tension of the water it will put more paint at the edge of the pool than in the center, causing rewet lines. If that weren't enough, paper when wet is most vulnerable to surface degradation if you try to move the paint with a brush. When you use a second wash to spread paint, it drives the pigment deeper into the fibers of the paper causing a decrease in the intensity of the color. Then there is the problem of mud. Napoleon never had half the problem with mud that I have. Repeated washings of colors, especially complimentary ones tend to take on the perception of a neutral gray or green. To military aficionados this wonderful shade is called OD Green (I think it is short for odious). Lastly there is a time and water limitation on washes. If you have enough water to allow the time to do all the manipulation of a wash you will wind up with a wan wash (this is a technical term). If you have the paint to make the wash strong you won't have the time to manage it. Taken as a whole I wonder why anyone with a functional synapse would take up this particular form of masochism. Wouldn't it be nice to live the carefree life of an oil painter? Never having to worry about anemic washes, rewet lines, and mud with all the time in the world to work on it. Art however presents no problems that an innovative or criminal mind can't overcome. The secret to solving the
problems...
|
|||
| Watercolor technique and the airbrush. (Some other choices for watercolors little enigmas) Click on
the photos to view a larger version. |
|||
2.
I start off with traditional washes in small areas. This will
give me a "watercolor look" that I can use the airbrush to build on. |
|||
3A.
As an expert on avoiding work, I use as few masks in the body of
the flower as possible. The overspray tends to get lost in the over all scheme of things.
When I do have need for a sharp line or to put two dissonant colors next to each other I
will use a brief mask that only covers the area adjacent to the work. |
|||
3B.
I use a Custom Micron here because of its low air pressure, It
won't lift the mask. I am able to put some more violet in the petal to distinguish itfrom its more neutral gray neighbor. |
|||
3C.
With the mask removed you can see that the petals are distinctive
enough to look different yet similar enough to look like they came from the same flower. |
|||
4.
One of the best uses of the airbrush is to enhance parts of a
wash. I am using it here to deepen some of the color in the individual folds of the
flower. |
|||
| 5. When some soft edge masking is needed, say to distinguish the front of the petal from the back, I use an Artool stencil, holding it off the surface of the paper so that some paint will blow under it and create a soft edge. | |||
![]() |
![]() |
||
6.
When the main body of the flower is complete I put a mask over
it. I am going to be doing more inarticulate and darker airbrush work on the background
and don't want too much over-spray to fall on the flower. |
|||
7.
Where I think that the edge should be softer, such as a petal in
the rear of the flower, I will pull up the edge of the mask. Some of the background paint
will blow under it and leave a soft edge. |
|||
8.
When I start to do the larger areas of the background I switch to
the Iwata Eclipse. I have modified this brush to have a .5 mm nozzle for larger coverage.
To bring out the color of the flower I find that it is useful to spray a layer of the
compliment adjacent to the flower. So for instance I will spray a violet or magenta
against an area that is yellow. |
|||
9.
As I darken the background with the airbrush I let the foliage
suggest itself. It should compliment the flower as the first criteria. One of the
compliments is that the background will appear quite out of focus as opposed to the flower
which will appear sharp. |
|||
Copyright AirbrushTalk